Purple Row’s Bold Gamble: Did Trading Angel Chivilli Just Change Everything?

Last week shook up the baseball scene when the Colorado Rockies decided to part ways with their promising right-handed pitcher, Angel Chivilli, sending him over to the New York Yankees in exchange for first base prospect T.J. Rumsfeld. Now, this wasn’t just some random swap—Rockies’ president of baseball operations, Paul DePodesta, laid it out straight: they weren’t exactly itching to move Chivilli, given his young age, electric arm, and knack for striking out batters. But with their bullpen boasting solid depth, and interest brewing from other teams over the past months in various relievers, this deal felt like one they couldn’t pass on. DePodesta emphasized they saw this as an opportunity to strengthen their position player lineup, trading from a place of strength rather than desperation.

On the flip side, Empire Sports media’s Alexander Wilson dubbed Chivilli a “high-risk stick of dynamite,” highlighting the gamble and potential reward he brings to the bullpen mix. That kind of dynamic definitely sparks debate—was the Rockies’ call to trade a young arm ripe with potential a savvy move or a misstep? Should they have rolled the dice on reviving Chivilli as a reclamation project, or was swapping him for Rumsfeld the right play to bolster their club’s future?

So, Rockies fans and baseball aficionados alike—what’s your take? Did Colorado make the right move by leveraging their bullpen depth, or did they give away a diamond in the rough? It’s a fascinating dilemma that’s bound to fuel chatter for a while.

LEARN MORE

Last week, the Colorado Rockies traded RHP Angel Chivilli to the New York Yankees for first base prospect T.J. Rumsfeld.

Later that day, president of baseball operations Paul DePodesta said of the move,

I wouldn’t say we necessarily wanted to [trade Chivilli], because he obviously has a terrific arm, he’s still very young, he did miss a lot of bats. I think there are a lot of things about Angel that are really attractive. We weren’t anxious to move him, but we did feel like our bullpen is a real area of depth, and there have been clubs asking about a number of our bullpen arms throughout the course of the last couple months. And ultimately, this was a deal that seemed to fit and seemed to come together for us. It wasn’t a situation where we were looking to move him by any stretch, there was just enough interest, and I found a deal that ultimately made sense. But we were dealing from an area of strength where we could then bolster our position player club going forward.

Alexander Wilson of Empire Sports media wrote positively about the potential of the move, referring to Chivilli’s arm as “a high-risk stick of dynamite,” concluding, “I’ll take the dynamite.”

So, Purple Row night owls, here’s the evening’s question: Was trading Chivilli the right move, or should the Rockies have kept him as a reclamation project and moved a different reliever?

Please keep in mind our Purple Row Community Guidelines when you’re commenting. Thanks!