Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

The Shocking Teams That Could Instantly Transform by Trading for Cooper Kupp Revealed!

The Shocking Teams That Could Instantly Transform by Trading for Cooper Kupp Revealed!

It gets murkier when looking at teams that either don’t have a No. 1 receiver who gets a lots of targets or have muddled receiver rooms with many above-average to average players. The reality is that Kupp isn’t likely to be in a lead role (we noted why earlier) in which he’s commanding 30% or more of the team’s targets in 2025 and beyond.

The Washington Commanders, for example, currently do not have a true target-sucking option, so putting Kupp on the roster would give him an assumed target rate north of 33%. That would potentially reduce some of the targets from WRs with higher ELO ratings.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Post Comment

RSS
Follow by Email